
AI-assisted development Courses
Want to develop faster with GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Codex and Cursor without compromising on quality? Our courses take you from vibe coding to secure production code.
AI-assisted development Courses
Claude Code for Developers
GitHub Copilot
Developing in Agentic AI Systems
AI-assisted development at a glance
AI-assisted development is about using AI as an integrated part of the daily developer workflow, not as a replacement for the developer, but as an assistant that suggests code, finds bugs, writes tests and speeds up routine tasks. Tools like GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Codex and Cursor are now a standard part of many development environments, and the way of working is changing fast: from single code suggestions to agents that can take an entire task from specification to finished change. This places new demands on the way you work and at the same time makes the classic craft more important, not less. If you use generative AI for things other than code, that falls under Generative AI & prompt engineering; if you build language models into your own products, see LLM integration & RAG.
The tools: GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Codex and Cursor
The tools have similar capabilities, but they differ in where they fit into your workday. GitHub Copilot lives in VS Code and the other major editors with inline suggestions, chat about the codebase and an agent mode, and it is tightly integrated with GitHub through pull requests and code review. Claude Code is an agent that works from the terminal: it reads the entire repository, plans, edits across files, runs tests and commands, and is well suited to larger, coherent tasks. Codex is OpenAI's equivalent coding agent, which can work in its own environment or in the cloud and deliver changes as pull requests. Cursor is an AI-first editor built on VS Code, where suggestions, chat and the agent are the interface itself. You learn to use them effectively, to give them the context about the codebase, conventions and requirements that determines the quality of what you get back, and to choose a tool based on the task rather than out of habit.
From autocomplete to agents
The first AI tools in the editor completed one line at a time. Today they can hold a conversation about the entire codebase, suggest changes across files, and, in agent mode, carry out a task on their own: read the code, make the change, run the tests, and present the result for review. You learn to use the full range, from inline suggestions through chat to agents, and to stay in control: what the agent may do on its own, what you want to see first, and how you review the result.
Vibe coding: when the idea comes first
The term vibe coding emerged in 2025 to describe a way of working where you describe what you want, let the AI write the code, and steer with feedback instead of writing every line yourself. It has genuinely lowered the barrier to creating software: subject-matter experts without a developer background can now build a working prototype in an afternoon, and that is a strength, not a threat. A quick POC can establish whether an idea holds up before anyone invests in it, and it can make the conversation between the business and developers far more concrete. We see vibe coding as a powerful tool for exactly that: exploration, prototypes and learning.
From POC to production: Don't underestimate the gap
The gap between a working prototype and a system in production, however, has not gotten any smaller, and it is easy to underestimate. Production code has to be maintainable by people other than the one who wrote it; it has to handle errors, load and malicious input; it has to be tested, version-controlled, monitored and safe to update. These requirements are cheap to account for from the start and expensive to discover once the solution is live, users depend on it, and no one can figure out how to change it without breaking something. AI-generated code needs to be reviewed like any other code, and experience is clear: the better you understand the code yourself, the better results you get from the AI, because you can set precise requirements and catch errors while they are still small.
The technical foundation: understand the system, not just the prompt
AI-assisted development works best on top of a solid technical foundation. A code suggestion can look right in isolation and still be wrong in the context where it has to work, and only someone who understands the system around the code can make that call. Git gives you the safety net that makes it safe to let an agent change the code: every change can be reviewed, compared and rolled back. Programming knowledge, whether in Python, C# or JavaScript, lets you read the suggestion instead of taking it on faith. An understanding of data and SQL is the key to the layer almost every system is built on, and Linux and the terminal are the environment that both development tools and AI agents work in. The more of this you master yourself, the more you can safely hand over to the AI, because you can see through what you get back.
Security and quality in the AI workflow
Working effectively with AI in the development process is a discipline in its own right. You learn to work spec-first and in small iterations, to use tests as guardrails for the agent's work, to keep secrets and sensitive data out of prompts, and to adapt code review to a reality where a growing share of the code is AI-generated. The goal is a way of working where AI increases your pace without compromising quality and security.
Free course advice
It matters a great deal to us that you find the course that creates the most value for you and your workplace. Take a few minutes to call or write to our advisors, who are ready to help with technical guidance, free of charge and with no obligation.
